The Candy House: A Novel
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
ONE of the TOP 10 BOOKS OF THE YEAR by THE NEW YORK TIMES * ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY * SLATE* THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER *
Also named one of the BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR by Vanity Fair, Time, NPR, The Guardian, Oprah Daily, Self, Vogue, The New Yorker, BBC, Vulture, and many more!
OLIVIA WILDE to direct A24's TV adaptation of THE CANDY HOUSE and A VISIT FROM THE GOON SQUAD!
From one of the most celebrated writers of our time comes an “inventive, effervescent” (Oprah Daily) novel about the memory and quest for authenticity and human connection.
The Candy House opens with the staggeringly brilliant Bix Bouton, whose company, Mandala, is so successful that he is “one of those tech demi-gods with whom we’re all on a first name basis.” Bix is forty, with four kids, restless, and desperate for a new idea, when he stumbles into a conversation group, mostly Columbia professors, one of whom is experimenting with downloading or “externalizing” memory. Within a decade, Bix’s new technology, “Own Your Unconscious”—which allows you access to every memory you’ve ever had, and to share your memories in exchange for access to the memories of others—has seduced multitudes.
In the world of Egan’s spectacular imagination, there are “counters” who track and exploit desires and there are “eluders,” those who understand the price of taking a bite of the Candy House. Egan introduces these characters in an astonishing array of narrative styles—from omniscient to first person plural to a duet of voices, an epistolary chapter, and a chapter of tweets. Intellectually dazzling, The Candy House is also a moving testament to the tenacity and transcendence of human longing for connection, family, privacy, and love.
“A beautiful exploration of loss, memory, and history” (San Francisco Chronicle), “this is minimalist maximalism. It’s as if Egan compressed a big 19th-century novel onto a flash drive” (The New York Times).
Jennifer Egan
Jennifer Egan is the author of six previous books of fiction: Manhattan Beach, winner of the Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in Fiction; A Visit from the Goon Squad, which won the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Critics Circle Award; The Keep; the story collection Emerald City; Look at Me, a National Book Award Finalist; and The Invisible Circus. Her work has appeared in The New Yorker, Harper’s Magazine, Granta, McSweeney’s, and The New York Times Magazine. Her website is JenniferEgan.com.
Read more from Jennifer Egan
The Best American Short Stories 2014 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fight of the Century: Writers Reflect on 100 Years of Landmark ACLU Cases Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Manhattan Beach: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The House of Mirth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to The Candy House
Related ebooks
Vladimir: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Mouth to Mouth: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Love Marriage: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How High We Go in the Dark: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Infinite Country: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Notes on an Execution: An Edgar Award Winner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cloud Cuckoo Land: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Big Swiss: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The School for Good Mothers: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Paris Apartment: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Poisonwood Bible: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You Made a Fool of Death with Your Beauty: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Are Not Like Them: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Many Daughters of Afong Moy: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everyone in This Room Will Someday Be Dead: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The People We Keep Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The It Girl Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Cloisters: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5One Italian Summer: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A History of Wild Places: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Candy House
208 ratings28 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This is my first Jennifer Eagen book and while at first this winding sprialy ride took a minute to adjust to, I ended up shedding a few tears of gratitude at the end. The Candy House explored themes and questions that currently plague us: technology, friend or foe? How does one shape their life? With adventure or a deep commitment to stability and certainty?
Ugh, I could keep going, but in short: I loved this book and highly recommend if you want a thought provoking read.1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jennifer Egan once more exceeds high expectations with her follow-up novel, The Candy House. Meant to be a companion to her renowned A Visit from the Geek Squad, it can also be enjoyed as a standalone. The author provides a unique setting that is an alternate version of 2010, almost identical to the real world, but with some important twists. In her rendering, a technology has been developed that allows users to upload their exact memories, to review and share. Egan employs a variety of scenarios and perspectives to postulate how lives might be affected by the technology, for better or worse. The Candy House asks why people would want to expose themselves and their personal data for public view. As would be expected, such an ability would create controversy and divide those who refuse to share their data. The book follows characters who are acting as representatives from both sides. By placing the plot within an alternate reality that closely mirrors our own, Egan can creatively reflect how quickly technology can drastically change a culture, on a personal to global level. Excellent, challenging and masterfully rendered, The Candy House is a fitting addition to Jennifer Egan’s illustrious body of work.Thanks to the author, Scribner and NetGalley for an ARC in exchange for an unbiased review.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I wanted to love this, but I aborted about halfway through: uneven stories/chapters: some wonderfully clever, others I couldn´t skim through fast enough. The flashes of brilliance just couldn´t make up for the overall tediousness.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I am a fan of Jennifer Egan and I especially loved A Visit to the Goon Squad. She attempts the same linked narrative style here, along with some experimental forays, (one fails completely, the other mildly interesting). I just could not get a foothold into the story and remained fairly disconnected for most of it. She is a fine writer and I admire her ambitious mind but this one just didn’t work for me.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The tech elements from the first book were rather clunky, so Egan has retconned the headsets from the first book into smartphones, but also made the universal consciousness tech hinted at in that book central to the story. This is unfortunate because it doesn’t really feel plausible at a basic science level — humans store complete audiovisual memories of everything that’s ever happened to them in their minds, only waiting for a machine to decode it? Give me a break. Because I didn’t buy into the sci-fi element, I had a harder time feeling immersed in the plot. However, Egan’s strength in all her books is her characters, and this is no exception. So apart from the failed suspension of disbelief, this was an enjoyable read, if not on the same level as Goon Squad.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Candy House is a sort of sequel to A Visit From the Goon Squad, but it is not really essential to have read the earlier novel first. In fact, I only realised this in the middle of reading and I have forgotten almost everything from the first book, read over 10 years ago, other than enjoying it. This is a series of linked narratives set in the near future and recent past, about characters who turn out to be linked together by family connections and friendships, but whose relationships are often rather fractured.A discussion between a tech entrepreneur and a group of academics takes the tech guy towards developing and making more money out of Own Your Unconscious, allowing people access to all their memories and those of people around them. It's an interesting idea and I enjoyed reading, but feel that I need to go back again to make more sense of what I read. I was struck though that this sounds potentially a bigger change than in the story it has turned out to be, that such a far reaching idea hasn't altered lives or society as we might think. Is that because, like current social media trends, some people want nothing to do with it. Thought provoking but and perhaps I will return to both books in the future.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5When it’s good, it’s very very good, but not as good as Goon Squad. Levels of enjoyment will depend on whether you see keeping track of so many characters and so many time jumps as fun or frustrating.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I agree with one of the other reviewers that this is not a book to listen to the audio. Most of the time I had no idea what was going on and thought I should abandon the audio. I have listened to A visit to the goon suad and cannot remember one single thing about it. Perhaps I should stick to her more conventional works. I must be in the minority as it has a rating of 4.16, alas i can only give 2,5
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I enjoyed The Goon Squad 11 years ago, but really had no interest in rereading it. Maybe it would be interesting to compare her pre-pandemic work with some of these characters to their pos-pandemic lives. Or maybe not. This novel stands on its own. And it's fine, but I never felt like I was swept up in a story--I felt like was very much reading Egan's work, waiting for her next Clever Item to come along. Lulu's list of rules was exhausting to read, and the email threads were just...tiring. I do too much of sorting out email threads like that for work to find it clever or witty. The PowerPoint in The Goon Squad seemed clever (would it if it came out now I wonder? maybe [book:Several People Are Typing|54468020] is the closest, and I found it pretty tiresome). The list of rules and email convos did not seem clever to me at all.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5as much as i wanted to enjoy this book, at the half-way mark, the POINT of the book still wasn't evident. there seemed to be no plot, even as multiple characters (and their individual thoughts and agendas) were paraded in front of me that all had some connection to each other. i found myself unwilling to keep reading to discover the reason why the book had good reviews...
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jennifer Egan describes The Candy House as a sister to her earlier A Visit from the Goon Squad, and it is. When I looked back at my notes for Goon Squad, I had said it was joyful to skip and skim through it, but would be a slog to try and read it all, or to try to read its interconnected stories from cover-to-cover. I It was only after starting Candy House that I remembered how I responded to the earlier book, and how I was also responding to this one. A dozen characters are introduced in the first few pages, so the reader has to either take notes or just go with the flow. Flow works best. Some characters are memorable, most are not, and their relationships to other people in the stories may or may not be important to understanding them. The stories circle around a sort of device that gives rise to what its owner firm calls the "collective consciousness", where people can have their memories downloaded in a way that they can review them, and, if they choose, can also experience the memories of anyone else who is part of this collective consciousness. This could make Candy House a science fiction novel, but with a bit of disbelief suspension, the book becomes more a story about what social media of different kinds are doing to us now. This is not a book I would have wanted to miss, but like much social media its form may be as important as its contents. No book can be completely understood, but not every book has to be read completely in order to understand it.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/52022 book #31. 2022. It's a little hard to explain what this book is about. It's a series of interconnected stories about people around the inventor of "Own Your Unconscious", a device which allows you to record all your memories. Very well written and I loved it.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Is this a novel or short stories? I clearly blundered by not reading Goon Squad first. Short stories about a new tech that transforms the world, and the characters share many connections. But if there was a unifying plot, I missed it.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wide ranging from the 60s to 2030s, this novel tracks our willing descent into a metaverse. Each chapter follows a character spinning from an early aughts discussion group. A couple of chapters stand out, one seemingly of tweets as poetry, the other as email/DMs threads. I typically dislike these twists in forms but Egan nearly pulls it off. You will typically figure out the next character in a passage or two, though I still long for a good expository story more often than not.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The concept of uploading our memories as part of the next move in social media is plausible and frightening. This book was so intriguing in its style and plot. It was a fun adventure.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5"Knowing everything is too much like knowing nothing. Without a story it is all just information."This quote from the very last moments of The Candy House serves on its own as a pretty thorough review of the book and a pretty thorough summation of much of what is wrong in the world. Last night I was having drinks with a much younger friend (just a few years older than my son) and I said that I think one of the things that leads to so much unhappiness and lack of connection in the 30 and under crowd is the deluge of uncontextualized information. It is exhausting trying to assimilate even a fraction of the information that is thrown at us every day, and all that energy would be so much more satisfyingly spent analyzing a few facts that will tell us more about something that means something to us and to our lives, or simply enhances expertise or satisfies true intellectual curiosity rather than simply making us feel a bit less FOMO. A lot of this book is about that. About tapping into other people's lives and experiences as a substitute for creating our own lives (The device to do this in the book is currently a bit of science fiction, but the experience of people staring at the inane input of influencers day after day rather than having experiences is the same.)"The Candy House" of which the book speaks is a reference to the witch's house in Hansel and Gretel. It is the shiny appealing bit of short term satisfaction that spurs us to enter its doors and sacrifice all. "Abandon hope all ye who enter here." And we do abandon hope, or more explicitly we abandon privacy, individuality and all sense of self all to get a little gingerbread (or convenience), a few empty calories. BUT Egan is no Ishiguro or Eggers, happy to share their fear of the hobgoblin of technology and have that be the end of the story. That is lazy. I got a headache from rolling my eyes when I attempted to read The Circle. Egan sees past this threat, she sees a way out, she sees that what matters is how we connect to one another and what we give and get from the ways in which se share our stories. Also she sees the advantages of committing our life to the public record. Others ignore that, but we need to get something to willingly give up so much, we need to get something we truly value in this exchange. It is a nuanced look, it is a smart look, it is a compellingly human look at what now and what next. It is also a really fun, sometimes heartbreaking, always fascinating story about people, and the ways in which imagination and intellect can be a very dangerous thing. Here, one of our fascinating main characters, Miranda Kline, uses her brilliance and the passionate interest in learning how people relate to one another to develop a theory of patterns of affinity. Another intriguing character, Bix, filled with nothing but goodwill and a great mind (informed by a love of literature) turns this theory into an algorithm and then into a method of uploading the contents of people's unconscious and conscious minds and to use that record in various ways including the creation of a "collective consciousness." No more memories spurred by a madeleine, now a literal record of memory as an immediate sense impression and as that impression is processed by the person. It is not an owned memory anymore, it belongs to everyone in the collective, everyone has access to everyone's experience. (Or at least the things that stay in memory -- presumably the burger I ate last night is not permanently stored and available for download.) It seems like the end of wonder, but as one of our characters, a numbers guy charged with turning human behavior into algorithms says, the act of codifying behavior "doesn't make human life any less remarkable, or even (this is counterintuitive, I know) less mysterious — any more than identifying the rhyme scheme in a poem devalues the poem itself." I think that is right. I hope that is right.One note -- this is a companion to A Visit from the Goon Squad, a book I loved very much, but there is no need to read Goon Squad to get this. Many of the characters that showed up in Goon Squad, some very briefly, show up here, but there is plenty of set up for each character and if I recall correctly Goon Squad doesn't provide backstory that would be helpful to understanding this book. It is just as creative and revelatory and captivating and delightful as Goon Squad but still absolutely its own book.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Candy House is a book of intertwined short stories. The stories are about some of the ancillary characters in A Visit From the Goon Squad. I read that years ago and my comment on in was that it was interesting. I don’t remember much of the plot at all, even after reading The Candy House. I fear that soon I won’t remember much of The Candy House either. The beauty of the book is the ideas and resultant thoughts that comes into one’s mind. The structure of the book and that of individual chapters also make the book unique and interesting. It IS a great book but it won’t be one that I keep in my memory for long, unless I upload my thoughts in the Mandala cube!
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This is the 4th novel that I have read by Jennifer Egan. This novel has many of the characters from her Pulitzer Prize winning novel " A Visit from the Good Squad". This book covers a time frame from the 1960's to the middle 2030's. The stories are interconnected and use different writing styles. It might help to read the Goon Squad first but not necessary. I read the Goon Squad 11 years ago and did not remember it that well but was still able to enjoy this book. The book deals with technology with the main connecting thread being "Own Your Own Consciousness" This software allows you to download all of your memories to a Mandela Cube that you can access at any time. However your consciousness becomes part of the collective consciousness that anyone can access. Sort of like social media but on a much more refined basis. Egan does a great job of showing the ramifications of this technology and others that she introduces throughout the book. Of course there are those that reject the technology and this makes for giving the book a wide range of activity. This is a very creative book with a large cast of characters. A map of the interactions would have helped but even if you don't remember how al lot the characters connect, you will still enjoy the book. Not everyone enjoys books with multiple characters that bounce around throughout large time frames. For me it totally works. If you never read Egan then start with this book. No matter what, you will be impressed with Egan's quite evident brilliance.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I loved A Visit from the Goon Squad written about a decade ago, and was excited to hear that the characters circle back in The Candy House. I'm a fan of interconnected stories and so trying to remember where I last saw Bennie Salazar or Shasha actually got me searching through the Goon Squad. I'm not sure that's for everybody and equally not sure it's necessary, but I marvel at the author's ability to rejoin the old gang and now use their children for the current narrative. Whereas Goon Squad was about the music industry, this is more about the direction of technology. Some of the novel takes place in the near future where people have the ability to download their memories into the cube and share their collective consciousness with others. This of course means there are also rebels of this trend who seek to elude this trail. Again Egan uses the structure of a concept album,(there's a New Yorker article about this if you're interested), to weave together seemingly separate tales to illustrate her ideas. I loved the second story about Alfred who obsesses over seeking authenticity and so screams in public to get a reaction. He manages to find a a perfect girlfriend who gets him." Authenticity,” he said, unfurling the word like an ancient, holy scroll. He almost never uttered it, lest overuse diminish its power. “Genuine human responses rather than the made-up crap we serve each other all day long. I’ve sacrificed everything for that. I think it’s worth it.” He was encouraged by Kristen’s look of fascination. “Do you do it during sex?” she asked." The third chapter about Alfred's brother Miles, is a wonderful spiral of a successful lawyer getting addicted to drugs and nearly ending his life. His redemption coming at the hands of his cousin Shashi's husband. And if you're keeping track Shasha, the kleptomaniac form Goon Squad is now a famous artist who constructs recycled sculptures in the dessert that are best seen from a hot air ballon. It's too much to summarize each section here and some are uniquely told in 2nd person or through text messages, but throughout Egan manages to connect enough to tell a satisfying tale. Highly recommend both novels, or anything she writes.Lines:Eamon’s long deadpan face seemed to shield an illicit excitement, Bix thought, like a generic house containing a meth lab.He felt the mystery of his own unconscious like a whale looming invisibly beneath a tiny swimmer. If he couldn’t search or retrieve or view his own past, then it wasn’t really his. It was lost.Jack was known for deflowering cheerleaders in the old camper cabins, but broken hearts were assuaged (to Alfred’s mind) by Jack’s goodwill, high spirits, and occasional flashes of motherless heartbreak, discernible (again, to Alfred) in his tendency to gaze out across the lake, which was deep and cold, formed by glaciers, and populated by thousands of Canada geese in fall.The ladies, whose curved fingernails had been lavished with the nuanced paintwork normally reserved for museum-quality surfboards, listened with barely repressed hilarity.Humor is impossible to quantify. For that reason, it is one of our chief tools in spotting proxies: vacant online identities maintained by a third party in order to conceal the fact that their human occupants have eluded...Mondrian’s most sophisticated proxies are live professionals—usually fiction writers, I’m told—who impersonate multiple identities at once.She ended up on methadone, with hepatitis C. Eventually only we could still see the flickering specter of her young self, flashing and bird-featured, like an antic ghost haunting a tumbledown mansion.Never trust a candy house! It was only a matter of time before someone made them pay for what they thought they were getting for free. Why could nobody see this?
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Candy House, Jennifer Egan, author; Michael Boatman, Niclole Lewis, Thomas Sadoski, Colin Donneli, Griffin Newman, Rebecca Lowman, Jackie Sanders, Lucy Liu, Christian Barillas, Tara Lynne Barr, Alex Allwine, Emily Tremaine, Kyle Beltran, Dan Bittner, Chris Henry Coffey, a full cast of narrators.Bix Bouton is a successful, black businessman. He married his wife, Lizzie, a white woman, in 1992. He is the founder of a technology company called Mandala. It has changed the character of the world. Mandala is an innovative business designed to make life easier and less stressful. Bix believed that an expansion of consciousness would free everyone to leave racism behind as a thing of the past. It would eliminate secrets, by freeing all ideas and memories, to be shared by all. Thus, we would all be the same, and we would all have equal access. There would be no secrets. Eventually, our every move would be tracked and our every thought would be known. All would be stored in a data base that could be easily accessed. Crime would diminish. Hatred would disappearThere are several characters followed throughout this novel that hearken back to “A Visit From The Goon Squad”. The novel begins with the memories of four young men, born in the thirties, who meet again in 1965. They had been part of a small singing group in college, known as the Dildos. This book, follows them, their relatives and friends, for the next several decades and into the future. The storyline introduces many characters and many timelines. Neither the narrative nor the timeline is linear. Each chapter is a story on its own, and the author does try to knit all the disparate components together at the end. She is only somewhat successful.I struggled to understand the message the author wanted to impart as the characters bounced around with the timeline. Often, I simply lost the thread of the story. I was drawn back again and again, however, because of the writing style, which, although it was sometimes confusing and too wordy, was also brilliant at other times. Still, when once in awhile I would think I understood the message from a character, another would enter the scene and I would be again, unsuccessfully, trying to place that character into the appropriate place in the novel.For instance, as an example of one character’s confused behavior we watch Chris go on and on about his job. He was “algebraizing” all thoughts and all intentions, reducing them to algebraic equations. Could there be such a man, one who was able to reduce the collective thoughts of the entire population, down to algorithms? Would he then be unable to control the events occurring around him, allowing himself to be duped by acquaintances or seduced by his professor, because in spite of his intelligence, he had so little common sense? Did Chris even believe in his work? Was the Professor Miranda Kline important? What about Comstock who actually duped him into carrying a suitcase for his odd “lady friend”, a stranger to Chris? Were both those incidents important? Did that narrative come together? Would the sharing of a collective consciousness, so completely, ultimately allow for more freedom and less stress or would it curtail freedom because if everyone knew what everyone thought, would it not diminish the need to think? Would everyone have to conform to this behavior? What about the eluders who wish to be unique again, not to be universally known in a data bank, like everyone else? Mondrian helped them to elude Mandala. They also ran a game room for drug addicts on Methadone. Was this incongruous? Even supporters of Mandala sometimes left the ranks to try and become somewhat invisible again. O'Brien was a saboteur. Were there really only two choices, Exile (Mandala) vs Freedom (Mondrian)? Was there no gray area?Near the end of his life, was even Bix Bouton questioning the results life’s work? Did it improve society or was it actually tearing it down? If everyone could be tracked, did his programs provide more freedom or cage people in? If we all were privy to each other’s thoughts, would we eventually stifle imagination as all ideas would be out there and all would be funneled into one similar space? Would there be pressure to accept one idea over all else? Who would get credit for the idea once it was out in the collective consciousness? Would it not be an invasion of privacy?Did Bouton’s original business idea of providing more freedom with more technology, actually get subverted so that it created less freedom as more technological advances were made? Did collective consciousness create a lack of creativity and imagination? Did conversation get stifled and all but disappear? Was it fair for Bix to make his money from an idea spawned by someone else? He did develop the idea further into a practical application. Was everyone required to be tracked and have their thoughts and memories made public?The name Mandala made me think of Nelson Mandela, the two words were so close. Was this a device engineered by Egan? After all Mandela was a man who had lost his freedom for decades? When he was freed, was he freer to do as he wished or more encumbered because he was in the public eye, obligated to everyone, no longer only those who followed his philosophy? Surely, his life was more comfortable, but was the lack of privacy better? Was the founder of Mandala deliberately portrayed as black so as to make the reader wonder if this idea of collective consciousness also created slaves of all its followers? These are unconventional questions for an unconventional novel.The novel was written with so many innovative ideas and creativity, but I think it tried to tackle too many of the problems of society; it was too long and too convoluted for most people to stay with it as the verbiage seemed to get out of control. For me, in the ened, it was still just too disconnected. However, when I finished the book, I was struck with this thought: How can a book that is written so brilliantly be so difficult to understand? Although it is the second book, the first being “A Visit From the Goon Squad”, I did not get the connection until I went back and read my review of that book, written a decade ago, in order to recall some of the characters. I realized, immediately, that I had pretty much the same feeling about both books. While the prose is often exceptional, the story doesn’t flow easily from one character to another. The author is so imaginative, witty, and thoughtful, but it was often repetitive, overworked and overly technical. Her ideas did not travel from one to another smoothly, nor did they intersect with each other conveniently. I can only hope I understood some of this novel and that my review is logical.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bix Bouton, the brilliant and successful owner of tech giant Mandala has developed new software that is completely game changing - Own Your Own Unconscious. It allows you to download your memories to a Mandela cube and to access them at any time. Not only that but, as the software evolves, you can download your memories to the Collective Consciousness which allows you to access the thoughts and memories of anyone else who has also downloaded to the Collective. But, like the candy house of the fairy tale, not everything is as it seems and there are potential dangers lurking within.The Candy House by Jennifer Egan is one of the most anticipated books of the year and deservedly so. It is a complex tale brilliantly told across decades through interlocking stories of many different characters, many of them recognizable from The Goon Squad, and with many different voices and narrative styles including epistolary and even a chapter consisting completely of tweets. It is about family and memory. the uniqueness of each individual as well as the similarities and, of course, the value as well as dangers inherent in technological advances. Although there are some similarities as well as characters from The GoonSquad, The Candy House is a stand-alone novel, one that is guaranteed to make you think while entertaining. Thanks to Netgalley and Simon & Schuster for the opportunity to read this book in exchange for an honest review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/52022. Jennifer Egan’s dystopian landscape is especially frightening to me because of the humanity, the fallibility, of her characters. People are playing God, creating tech that seems omniscient, or nearly so, but people are still so painfully human and imperfect, even as technology pushes them to their limits. And nostalgia is playing a part, almost a character. Bennie is longing to bring music to young people the way it used to be, so pure. Gregory is longing for literature to hold the status it once held, the possibility of transcendence. Bix almost regrets his creation, the Mandala Cube, Own Your Own Consciousness, when he sees how it is used in the real world. This book carries on in the tradition of Dave Eggers’ The Circle, with some people trying to escape Big Brother’s all-seeing eye.Speculative fiction has for years posited implants, augmentations, interfaces, or weevils as Egan calls them, technology in our bodies able to interact with our brains, translate our thoughts, visions, dreams, memories, or feelings to computers, or the cloud, so others can access them. For another novel riffing on some of the possible ramifications of such technology, this one is mild in terms of negative consequences. Except as regarding beautiful women being used as spies. That part was creepy and dire. So thought-provoking, but once again I felt let down at the end. Like nothing had really happened or been resolved. I find her writing fairly mesmerizing, and her leaping from character to character fascinating, but her endings unsatisfying.I think the technology we already have is almost destroying us and nobody’s dealing with what that’s like in fiction yet. Reality feels more like The Matrix to me.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5“Knowing everything is too much like knowing nothing; without a story, it’s all just information.”
Series of interconnected short stories, set in the present and near future, about the impact of technology on our lives. It is a follow-up to A Visit from the Goon Squad and contains several of the same characters. Entrepreneur Bix Bouton has developed the next level in social media, the Own Your Unconscious App, where memories can be collectively captured and shared. A segment of society rebels against this technology, attempting to live off the grid. They are called “eluders.” Main themes are privacy rights, memory, and authenticity (or lack thereof).
I have read two of her other works, and I tend to enjoy Jennifer Egan’s elegant writing style. This novel is creative and has an unusual structure. It is told in changing perspectives and nonlinear timeline. The plot (I use the term loosely) is difficult to describe, since it loops backward and forward, with common concepts appearing in different sections. There are a large number of characters. A minor character mentioned in the previous chapter becomes a key player in the next.
It is a concept novel – a challenge to our increasing reliance on technology for entertainment and daily living, substituting the artificial for the real. It definitely spurs questions. If such software existed, would we really want to share our memories with the “collective?” Would the benefits of retrieving pieces of our partially forgotten experiences be worth the loss of privacy?
There is a pleasing complexity to this novel. I particularly enjoyed the more straight-forward stories, even though they are told in fragments and must be mentally assembled by the reader. There are a few sections toward the end that abruptly change in style to a series of commands (similar to tweets), and another comprised of emails and text messages. These segments are a bit too scattered and disjointed for my taste. I think this book will appeal to those who have read and enjoyed A Visit to the Goon Squad, which I recommend reading first. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A look at a not-unrealistic near-future told in Egan's signature style, meaning I loved some chapters and could not connect with others.
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This novel takes us on a complicated thread connecting characters and plot lines through time, starting with the development of a new software application “Own Your Unconscious.” Using this app, or by “taking a bite of the Candy House,” people can access memories of others in exchange for contributing memories of their own to a common database - a sort of extension of the DNA databases we have today.Stories of the characters are related in a variety of styles - from omniscient to first person plural to tweets and letters, and we are never sure at first who is the subject of each chapter.While I admired the author’s brilliance, I found the book extremely hard to follow, and characters were switched and dropped just as I was beginning to get a sense of who they were and build up some empathy with them. One theme interconnecting the stories seemed to be that while all humans are unique, we all have much in common as well. The lures and dangers of advanced technology plays a role as well. But frankly, it was mostly a little beyond me.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A book about memory and technology, very much in the style of A Visit from the Goon Squad, so if you enjoyed that novel, you are likely to enjoy this (although there is no PowerPoint chapter!). Egan uses chapters from multiple viewpoints over different times to create a collage of stories, which can feel forced and artificial for some chapters, quite hard work to follow sometimes (remembering who is related to who), but works overall for me. A good read, but not an easy read.The Candy House is a sequel of sorts to A Visit from the Goon Squad, but as I had read this more than ten years ago, this came to me from a feeling of familiarity with the names, rather than storylines.I received a Netgalley copy of this book, but this review is my honest opinion.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A sort of sequel to A Visit from the Goon Squad, this is a series of stories following the members of a family and those who interact with them in an alternate version of our present, in which people can upload their consciousness and view events from their lives they'd forgotten as well as being able to access moments from the point of view of others. This conceit plays out with varying degrees of importance in each story. Jennifer Egan is a talented and assured writer, which makes every sentence a pleasure to read and each individual chapter (with one exception) a delight to read. But the book itself is hard to grasp hold of and I don't expect to remember much about it. I did like thinking about whether I'd upload my consciousness or become one of the "eluders." I initially thought I'd stay far away, but let's be honest -- I'm too nosy to hold out for more than a few moments. The chapters where she kept the focus on the immediate family were excellent, the other ones maybe less so. Which is not to say that Egan's writing isn't fantastic no matter what she's writing about, she just does better with more to work with.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Early in the pandemic I reread A Visit From the Goon Squad and was overjoyed to find it as imaginative, interesting and well-written as I remembered; my joy runneth over when I realized that Jennifer Egan’s newest book, The Candy House picks up where Goon Squad left off. Similar in style — but tighter and more refined — The Candy House jumps from character to character and time to time as interconnected stories with many familiar faces and stories from Goon Squad. At the heart of these stories, Egan writes about technology, relationships, and families with wit, skill, and heart. A definite must-read for Egan fans, and literary fiction readers who don’t mind stretching their understanding of what a novel is.
Book preview
The Candy House - Jennifer Egan
BUILD
The Affinity Charm
1
I have this craving,
Bix said as he stood beside the bed stretching out his shoulders and spine, a nightly ritual before lying down. Just to talk.
Lizzie met his eyes over the dark curls of Gregory, their youngest, who was suckling at her breast. Listening,
she murmured.
It’s…
He took a long breath. I don’t know. Hard.
Lizzie sat up, and Bix saw that he’d alarmed her. Gregory, dislodged, squawked, Mama! I can’t reach.
He had just turned three.
We’ve got to wean this kid,
Bix muttered.
No,
Gregory objected sharply, with a reproving glance at Bix. I don’t want to.
Lizzie succumbed to Gregory’s tugs and lay back down. Bix wondered if this last of their four children might, with his wife’s complicity, prolong his infancy into adulthood. He stretched out beside the two of them and peered anxiously into her eyes.
What’s wrong, love?
Lizzie whispered.
Nothing,
he lied, because the trouble was too pervasive, too amorphous to explain. He chased it with a truth: I keep thinking about East Seventh Street. Those conversations.
Again,
she said softly.
Again.
But why?
Bix didn’t know why—especially since he’d only half-listened, back on East Seventh Street, as Lizzie and her friends called out to one another through a cumulus of pot smoke like disoriented hikers in a foggy valley: How is love different from lust? Does evil exist? Bix was halfway through his PhD by the time Lizzie moved in with him, and he’d already had those conversations in high school and his first couple of years at Penn. His present nostalgia was for what he’d felt overhearing Lizzie and her friends from his perch before his SPARCstation computer linked by a modem to the Viola World Wide Web: a secret, ecstatic knowledge that the world these undergrads were so busy defining, in 1992, would soon be obsolete.
Gregory nursed. Lizzie drowsed. Can we?
Bix pressed. Have a conversation like that?
Now?
She looked drained—was being drained before his eyes! Bix knew she would rise at six to deal with the kids while he meditated and then began his calls to Asia. He felt a wave of desperation. Whom could he talk with in that casual, wide-open, studenty way that people talked in college? Anyone working at Mandala would try, in some sense, to please him. Anyone not at Mandala would presume an agenda, possibly a test—a test whose reward would be employment at Mandala! His parents, sisters? He’d never talked to them that way, much as he loved them.
When Lizzie and Gregory were fully asleep, Bix carried his son down the hall to his toddler bed. He decided to get dressed again and go outside. It was after eleven. It violated his board’s security requirements for him to walk New York’s streets alone at any hour, much less after dark, so he avoided the trademark deconstructed zoot suit he’d just taken off (inspired by the ska bands he’d loved in high school) and the small leather fedora he’d worn since leaving NYU fifteen years ago to assuage the weird exposure he’d felt after cutting off his dreads. He unearthed from his closet a camouflage army jacket and a pair of scuffed boots and entered the Chelsea night bareheaded, bridling at the cold breeze on his scalp—now bald at the crown, it was true. He was about to wave at the camera for the guards to let him back in so he could grab the hat, when he noticed a street vendor on the corner of Seventh Avenue. He walked down Twenty-first Street to the stall and tried on a black wool beanie, checking his look in a small round mirror affixed to the side of the stall. He appeared utterly ordinary in the beanie, even to himself. The vendor accepted his five-dollar bill as he would have anyone’s, and the transaction flooded Bix’s heart with impish delight. He’d come to expect recognition wherever he went. Anonymity felt new.
It was early October, a razor of cold in the breeze. Bix walked uptown on Seventh Avenue intending to turn around after a few blocks. But walking in the dark felt good. It returned him to the East Seventh Street years: those occasional nights, early on, when Lizzie’s parents visited from San Antonio. They believed she was sharing the apartment with her friend Sasha, also an NYU sophomore, a ruse Sasha corroborated by doing laundry in the bathroom the day Lizzie’s parents came to see the apartment at the start of fall semester. Lizzie had been raised in a world oblivious to Black people except those who served and caddied at her parents’ country club. So frightened was she of their presumptive horror at her living with a Black boyfriend that Bix was banished from their bed during her parents’ first visits, even though they stayed in a midtown hotel! It didn’t matter; they would just know. So Bix had walked, occasionally collapsing in the engineering lab under the guise of pulling an all-nighter. The walks had left a body memory: a dogged imperative to keep going despite his resentment and exhaustion. It sickened him to think he’d put up with it—although he felt it justified, on some cosmic balance sheet, the fact that Lizzie now managed every facet of their domestic lives so that he could work and travel as he pleased. The legion of good things that had come to him since could be seen as recompense for those walks. Still, why? Was the sex really that good? (Well, yes.) Was his self-esteem so low that he’d indulged his white girlfriend’s magical thinking without protest? Had he enjoyed being her illicit secret?
None of that. What had fueled Bix’s indulgence, his endurance, was the thrall of his Vision, which burned with hypnotic clarity on those nights of slogging exile. Lizzie and her friends barely knew what the Internet was in 1992, but Bix could feel the vibrations of an invisible web of connection forcing its way through the familiar world like cracks riddling a windshield. Life as they knew it would soon shatter and be swept away, at which point everyone would rise together into a new metaphysical sphere. Bix had imagined it like the Last Judgment paintings whose reproductions he used to collect, but without hell. The opposite: disembodied, he believed, Black people would be delivered from the hatred that hemmed and stymied them in the physical world. At last they could move and gather at will, without pressure from the likes of Lizzie’s parents: those faceless Texans who opposed Bix without knowing he existed. The term social media
wouldn’t be coined to describe Mandala’s business for almost a decade, but Bix had conceived of it long before he brought it to pass.
He’d kept the utopian fantasy to himself, thank God—it looked comically naive from a 2010 perspective. But the Vision’s basic architecture—both global and personal—had proved correct. Lizzie’s parents attended (stiffly) their wedding in Tompkins Square Park in 1996, but no more stiffly than Bix’s own parents, for whom proper nuptials did not include a mage, jugglers, or fast fiddling. When the kids started coming, everyone relaxed. Since Lizzie’s father died last year, her mother had taken to calling him late at night when she knew Lizzie would be asleep, to talk about the family: Would Richard, their oldest, like to learn to ride horses? Would the girls enjoy a Broadway musical? In person, his mother-in-law’s Texas twang grated on Bix, but there was no denying the zing of satisfaction her same voice, disembodied at night, afforded him. Every word they exchanged through the ether was a reminder that he’d been right.
The East Seventh Street conversations ended on a single morning. After a night of partying, two of Lizzie’s closest friends went swimming in the East River, and one was carried away by a current and drowned. Lizzie’s parents had been visiting at the time, a circumstance that chanced to place Bix near the tragedy. He’d run into Rob and Drew in the wee hours in the East Village and done E with them, and the three of them had crossed the overpass to the river together, at sunrise. The impulsive swim happened after Bix had gone home, farther down the river. Although he’d repeated every detail about that morning for the police inquest, it was vague to him now. Seventeen years had passed. He could hardly picture the two boys.
He turned left on Broadway and followed it all the way up to 110th Street—his first such perambulation since becoming famous over a decade ago. He’d never spent much time in the neighborhood around Columbia, and something appealed to him about its hilly streets and grand prewar apartment buildings. Gazing up at the lighted windows of one, Bix thought he could practically hear a potency of ideas simmering behind it.
On his way to the subway (another first-in-a-decade), he paused at a lamppost feathered with paper flyers advertising lost pets and used furniture. A printed poster caught his eye: an on-campus lecture to be given by Miranda Kline, the anthropologist. Bix was deeply familiar with Miranda Kline, and she with him. He’d encountered her book, Patterns of Affinity, a year after forming Mandala, and its ideas had exploded in his mind like ink from a squid, and made him very rich. The fact that MK (as Kline was affectionately known in his world) deplored the uses Bix and his ilk had made of her theory only sharpened his fascination with her.
A handwritten flyer was stapled alongside the poster: Let’s Talk! Asking Big Questions Across Disciplines in Plain Language.
An introductory meeting was scheduled to follow Kline’s lecture three weeks later. Bix felt a quickening at the coincidence. He took a picture of the poster and then, just for fun, tore off one of the paper tabs from the bottom of Let’s Talk
and slipped it into his pocket, marveling at the fact that, even in the new world he’d helped to make, people still taped pages to lampposts.
2
Three weeks later, he found himself on the eighth floor of one of those stately, faded apartment buildings around Columbia University—possibly the very one he’d admired from below. The apartment bore a pleasing resemblance to what Bix had imagined: worn parquet floors, smudged white moldings, framed engravings and small sculptures (the hosts were art history professors) hanging on the walls and over doorways, tucked among rows of books.
Apart from the hosts and one other couple, all eight Let’s Talk
attendees were strangers to one another. Bix had decided to forgo Miranda Kline’s lecture (presuming he could have finagled entry); her antipathy toward him made it seem wrong to attend, even in disguise. His disguise was Walter Wade,
graduate student in electrical engineering—in other words, Bix himself, seventeen years ago. What gave him the chutzpah to pose as a graduate student all these years later was the confidence that he looked much younger at forty-one than most white people did. But he’d erred in assuming that the other discussion group members would be white: Portia, one of their art historian hosts, was Asian, and there was a Latina animal studies professor from Brazil. Rebecca Amari, the youngest, a PhD candidate in sociology (the only other student besides Walter Wade
), was ethnically ambiguous and, he suspected, Black—there’d been a twinge of recognition between them. Rebecca was also disarmingly pretty, a fact heightened, not muted, by her Dick Tracy eyeglasses.
Luckily, Bix had marshaled other tools of identity concealment. Online, he’d purchased a headscarf with dreadlocks emerging from the back. The price was exorbitant but the dreads looked and felt real, and their weight between his shoulder blades was like the touch of a ghost. He’d known that weight for many years, and liked having it back.
When everyone had settled onto couches and chairs and introduced themselves, Bix, unable to repress his curiosity, said, So. What was she like, Miranda Kline?
Surprisingly funny,
said Ted Hollander, Portia’s art historian husband. He looked to be in his late fifties, a generation older than Portia. Their toddler daughter had already charged into the living room pursued by an undergraduate babysitter. I thought she’d be dour, but she was almost playful.
What makes her dour is people stealing her ideas,
said Fern, dean of the women’s studies department and rather dour herself, Bix thought.
People have used her ideas in ways she didn’t intend,
Ted said. But I don’t think even Kline calls it theft.
She calls it ‘perversion,’ doesn’t she?
Rebecca asked tentatively.
I was surprised by her beauty,
said Tessa, a young professor of dance whose husband, Cyril (mathematics), was also in attendance. Even at sixty.
Ahem,
Ted said good-naturedly. Sixty isn’t so very ancient.
Is her appearance relevant?
Fern challenged Tessa.
Cyril, who took Tessa’s part in everything, bristled. Miranda Kline would say it was relevant,
he said. More than half the Affinity Traits in her book have to do with physical appearance.
"Patterns of Affinity can probably explain each of our reactions to Miranda Kline," Tessa said.
Despite assenting murmurs, Bix was pretty sure that, apart from himself (and he wasn’t telling), only Cyril and Tessa had read Kline’s masterwork, a slender monograph containing algorithms that explained trust and influence among members of a Brazilian tribe. The Genome of Inclinations,
it was often called.
It’s sad,
Portia said. Kline is better known for having had her work co-opted by social media companies than for the work itself.
If it hadn’t been co-opted, there wouldn’t have been five hundred people in that auditorium,
said Eamon, a cultural historian visiting from the University of Edinburgh and writing a book on product reviews. Eamon’s long deadpan face seemed to shield an illicit excitement, Bix thought, like a generic house containing a meth lab.
Maybe fighting for the original intent of her work is a way of staying connected to it—of owning it,
said Kacia, the Brazilian animal studies professor.
Maybe she’d have some new theories by now if she wasn’t so busy fighting over the old one,
Eamon countered.
How many seminal theories can one scholar produce in a lifetime?
Cyril asked.
Indeed,
Bix murmured, and felt the stirring of a familiar dread.
Especially if she started late?
Fern added.
Or had children,
said Portia, with an anxious glance at her daughter’s toy stove in the living room corner.
That’s why Miranda Kline started late,
Fern said. She had two daughters back-to-back, and the husband left her while they were in diapers. Kline is his name, not hers. Some kind of record producer.
That is fucked up,
Bix said, forcing out the profanity as part of his disguise. He was known not to curse; his mother, a sixth-grade grammar teacher, had heaped such withering scorn on the repetitive dullness and infantile content of profanity that she’d managed to annul its transgressive power. Later, Bix had relished the distinction that not cursing gave him from other tech leaders, whose foulmouthed tantrums were infamous.
Anyway, the husband is dead,
Fern said. To hell with him.
Ooh, a retributivist among us,
Eamon said with a suggestive waggle of eyebrows. Despite the stated goal of using plain language,
the professors were helplessly prone to academic-ese; Bix could imagine Cyril and Tessa’s pillow talk including terms like desideratum
and purely notional.
Rebecca caught his eye and Bix grinned—as heady a sensation as taking off his shirt. At his fortieth-birthday party last year, he’d been presented with a glossy pamphlet entitled Bixpressions
that codified, with photographs, a system of meanings assigned to barely perceptible shifts of his eyes, hands, and posture. Back when he was the only Black PhD student in NYU’s engineering lab, Bix had found himself laughing hard at other people’s jokes and trying to make them laugh, a dynamic that left him feeling hollow and depressed. After getting his PhD, he cut out laughing at work, then cut out smiling, and cultivated instead an air of hyperattentive absorption. He listened, he witnessed, but with almost no visible response. That discipline had intensified his focus to a pitch that he was convinced, in retrospect, had helped him outwit and outmaneuver the forces aligned in readiness to absorb him, co-opt him, shunt him aside and replace him with the white men everyone expected to see. They had come for him, of course—from above and from below, from inside and from every side. Sometimes they were friends; sometimes he’d trusted them. But never too much. Bix anticipated each campaign to undermine or unseat him long before it coalesced, and he had his answer ready when it did. They couldn’t get in front of him. He gave some of them jobs in the end, harnessing their wily energies to advance his work.
His own father had regarded Bix’s rise with wariness. A company man who wore the silver watch he’d been presented at his retirement from a managerial role at a heating and cooling corporation outside Philadelphia, Bix’s father had defended Mayor Goode’s decision to bomb the house of the MOVE slobs
who put the mayor in an impossible position
(his father’s words) in 1985. Bix was sixteen, and the fights he’d had with his father over that bombing, and the resulting destruction of two city blocks, had opened a chasm between them that never quite closed. Even now he felt the whiff of his father’s disapproval—for having overreached, or become a celebrity (and thereby a target), or failed to heed his father’s lectures (delivered liberally to this day from the helm of a small motorboat his father used to fish along the Florida coast), whose refrain, to Bix’s ears, was: Think small or get hurt.
I wonder,
Rebecca mused a little shyly, if what happened to Miranda Kline’s theory makes her a tragic figure. I mean, in the Ancient Greek sense.
Interesting,
Tessa said.
"We must have the Poetics," Portia said, and Bix watched in amazement as Ted rose from his chair to look for a physical copy. None of these academics seemed to have so much as a BlackBerry, much less an iPhone—in 2010! It was like infiltrating a Luddite underground! Bix got up, too, ostensibly to help Ted search, but really for an excuse to look around the apartment. Built-in bookshelves lined every wall, even the hallway, and he ambled among these examining the spines of oversize hardcover art books and old yellowed paperbacks. Faded photographs were scattered among the books in small frames: little boys grinning outside a rambling house among piles of raked leaves, or snowdrifts, or heavy summer greenery. Boys with baseball bats, soccer balls. Who could they be? The answer arrived in a photo of a much younger Ted Hollander hoisting one of those boys to place a star upon a Christmas tree. So the professor had a previous life—in the suburbs, or maybe the country, where he’d raised sons before the arrival of digital photography. Had Portia been his student? The age spread was suggestive. But why assume that Ted had chucked his old life? Maybe that life had chucked him.
Could you start again without chucking everything?
The question intensified Bix’s dread of minutes before, and he retreated to the bathroom to ride it out. An age-splotched mirror hung above a bulbous porcelain sink, and he sat on the toilet cover to avoid it. He shut his eyes and focused on his breathing. His original Vision—that luminous sphere of interconnection he’d conceived during the East Seventh Street years—had become the business of Mandala: implementing it, expanding it, finessing it, monetizing it, selling it, sustaining it, improving it, refreshing it, ubiquitizing it, standardizing it, and globalizing it. Soon that work would be complete. And then? He’d long been aware of a suggestive edge in the middle distance of his mental landscape, beyond which his next vision lay in wait. But whenever he tried to peek beyond that edge, his mind went white. At first he’d approached that pale expanse with curiosity: Was it icebergs? A climate-related vision? The blank curtain of a theatrical vision or the empty screen of a cinematic one? Gradually, he began to sense that the whiteness was not a substance but an absence. It was nothing. Bix had no vision beyond the one he’d nearly exhausted.
This knowledge arrived decisively on a Sunday morning a few months after his fortieth birthday as he lounged in bed with Lizzie and the kids, and the jolting horror of it made him bolt to the bathroom and vomit in secret. The absence of a new vision destabilized his sense of everything he’d done; what was it worth if it led to nothing—if, by forty, he was reduced to buying or stealing the rest of his ideas? The notion gave him a haunted, hunted feeling. Had he overreached? In the year since that awful morning, the Anti-Vision had shadowed him, sometimes barely perceptible but never entirely disappearing, whether he was walking his kids to school or dining at the White House, as he’d done four times in the year and a half since Barack and Michelle came in. He could be addressing an audience of thousands, or in bed helping Lizzie to achieve her elusive orgasm, when the ominous vacancy would begin to drone at him, harbinger of a void that harried and appalled him. More than once he’d pictured himself clutching Lizzie and whimpering, Help me. I’m finished.
But Bix Bouton couldn’t say such a thing ever, to anyone. Above all, he had to maintain; fulfill his roles of husband, father, boss, tech icon, obedient son, major political contributor, and indefatigably attentive sexual partner. The man who longed to return to the university, in hopes of provoking a fresh revelation to shape the remainder of his life, would have to be a different man.
He returned to the living room to find Cyril and Tessa poring over a volume with carnal transport, as if it were a tub of ice cream. You found it,
Bix said, and Tessa grinned, holding up a volume of Aristotle from the same Great Books
set his parents had purchased along with their treasured Encyclopaedia Britannica. Bix had reverently consulted the Britannica as a kid, quoting from it in school reports on cannibals and hemlock and Pluto; reading the animal entries purely for pleasure. Four years ago, when his parents moved into their modest Florida condo—having refused his help to buy a larger one, out of pride (his father) and modesty (his mother)—Bix boxed up those volumes and left them on the sidewalk outside the West Philadelphia home where he’d grown up. In the new world he’d helped to make, no one would ever need to open a physical encyclopedia.
In my reading of the Aristotle,
Tessa said, "—mind you, I’m a dance professor, there are probably a million scholarly pages on this—but Miranda Kline is not a tragic figure. For her to be Tragic-tragic, the people who appropriated her theory would have had to be related to her. That would increase the betrayal and the dramatic irony."
"Also, didn’t she sell the theory? Or the algorithms?" Kacia asked.
I think there’s a mystery around that,
Portia said. Someone sold it, but not Kline.
It was her intellectual property,
Fern said. How could anyone else have sold it?
As one of the purchasers of Kline’s algorithms, Bix squirmed in a state of squeamish duplicity. He was relieved when Ted said, Here’s a different question: Miranda Kline’s algorithms have helped social media companies to predict trust and influence, and they’ve made a fortune off them. Is that necessarily bad?
Everyone turned to him in surprise. "I’m not saying it isn’t bad, Ted said.
But let’s not take that for granted, let’s examine it. If you look at baseball, every action is measurable: the speed and type of pitches, who gets on base and how. The game is a dynamic interaction among human beings, but it can also be described quantitatively, using numbers and symbols, to someone who knows how to read them."
Are you such a person?
Cyril asked incredulously.
He is such a person,
Portia said with a laugh, slipping an arm around her husband.
My three sons played Little League,
Ted said. Call it Stockholm syndrome.
Three?
Bix said. I thought there were two. In your pictures.
Scourge of the middle son,
Ted said. "Everyone forgets poor Ames. Anyway, my point is that quantification, per se, doesn’t ruin baseball. In fact, it deepens our understanding of it. So why are we so averse to letting ourselves be quantified?"
Bix knew, from his cursory research online, that Ted Hollander’s academic success had come in 1998, the same year Bix incorporated Mandala. Already midcareer, Ted published Van Gogh, Painter of Sound, which found correlations between Van Gogh’s types of brushstroke and the proximity of noisemaking creatures like cicadas, bees, crickets, and woodpeckers—whose microscopic traces had been detected in the paint itself.
Ted and I disagree about this,
Portia said. I think that if the point of quantifying human beings is to profit from their actions, it’s dehumanizing—Orwellian, even.
"But science is quantification, Kacia said.
That’s how we solve mysteries and make discoveries. And with each new step, there is always the worry that we might be ‘crossing the line.’ It used to be called blasphemy, but now it’s something more vague that boils down to knowing too much. For example, in my lab we’ve begun to externalize animal consciousness—"
I’m sorry,
Bix interrupted, thinking he’d misheard. You’re doing what?
We can upload an animal’s perceptions,
Kacia said. Using brain sensors. For example, I can capture a portion of a cat’s consciousness and then view it with a headset exactly as if I am the cat. Ultimately, this will help us to learn how different animals perceive and what they remember—basically, how they think.
Bix tingled with sudden alertness.
The technology is still very crude,
Kacia said. "But already, there is controversy: Are we crossing a line by breaching the mind of another sentient creature? Are we opening a Pandora’s box?"
We’re back to the problem of free will,
Eamon said. If God is omnipotent, does that make us puppets? And if we are puppets, are we better off knowing that or not?
To hell with God,
Fern said. I’m worried about the Internet.
By which you mean an all-seeing, all-knowing entity that may be predicting and controlling your behavior, even when you think you’re choosing for yourself?
Eamon asked with a sly glance at Rebecca. He’d been flirting with her all night.
Ah!
Tessa said, seizing Cyril’s hand. This is getting interesting.
3
Bix left Ted and Portia’s apartment ablaze with hope. He’d felt a shift in himself at points during the discussion, an arousal of thought that seemed familiar from long ago. He rode the elevator down with Eamon, Cyril, and Tessa while the others lagged behind, looking at some plaster reliefs Ted had bought on a trip to Naples decades before. Outside the building, Bix idled in a circle of small talk, unsure how to break away without seeming rude. He was reluctant to let it be known he was heading downtown; would a Columbia graduate student live downtown?
It turned out that Eamon was walking west and Cyril and Tessa were taking the train to Inwood, having been priced out of the neighborhood around Columbia and unable, as assistant professors, to get faculty housing. Bix reflected guiltily on his five-story townhouse. The professors had mentioned that they were childless, and one side of Cyril’s wire-rimmed glasses was held together with a paper clip. But there was a crackle of conductivity between these two; apparently, ideas were enough.
Buoyed by a sense that he could go anywhere as Walter Wade, Bix strode in the direction of Central Park. But the half-bare trees silhouetted against a sallow sky put him off before he reached the entrance. He wished it were snowing; he loved snowy nights in New York. He longed to lie down beside Lizzie and whichever kids had been washed, by nightmares or nursing, into their oceanic bed. It was after eleven. He doubled back to Broadway and got on the 1 train, then noticed an express at Ninety-sixth and switched, hoping to overtake a faster local. From his Walter backpack, he unearthed another disguise element: the copy of Ulysses he’d read in graduate school with the explicit aim of acquiring literary depth. What the tome had delivered concretely was Lizzie, in whom (through a calculus Miranda Kline surely could have explained) the combination of James Joyce and waist-length dreads provoked irresistible sexual desire. The calculus on Bix’s end had involved a pair of tan patent-leather boots that went higher than Lizzie’s knees. He’d kept Ulysses as a romantic artifact, although its worn look derived more from the passage of years than rereading. He opened it randomly.
"—Eureka! Buck Mulligan